USPTO serial 88345794
IRONNINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, CHRISTOPHER J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IRONNINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fredericksburg, VA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of computer cyber security; Providing online non-downloadable training software for Information Technology computer, Network and security Certification Training and practice test in the fields of computer cybersecurity, computer education, information technology, computer cybersecurity legal compliance, computer ethics, business computer information security, computer technology for performing background investigations, information technology skills, and information technology certification; Consulting services in the fields of Information Technology design, installation and security, Policy, procedure, Laws, Regulations implementation and compliance procedures; Computer security consultancy in the nature of advanced cybersecurity to detect and remediate advanced persistent threats and insider threats and include offensive cyber capabilities; Computer security threat analysis for protecting data; Computer security services in the nature of administering digital certificates; Encryption and decryption of data; Authentication of data, namely, of digital certificates; Scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability; Computer security services, namely, enforcing, restricting and controlling access privileges of users of computing resources for cloud, mobile or network resources based on assigned credentials; Computer security consultancy in the fields of identity and access management software solutions; Electronic signature verification services using technology to authenticate user identity through multi-factor authentication, issuance and validation of digital certificates, public key infrastructure (PKI), and security operating center tools; Computer server hosting services, namely, hosting online virtual desktop environments through use of hosted computer hardware and computer software resources for secure remote encrypted access to mission applications and information; Data migration services; Installation and maintenance of computer software; Information technology consulting services; Computer network security, information technology systems security, and mobile device software security consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Consulting services in the field of computer privacy laws; Consulting services in the field of regulatory development, namely, reviewing standards and practices to assure compliance with NIST, ISO, SCF, PCI DSS, COBIT 5, ENISA, FISMA, FedRAMP, OWASP, PCI, DoD, NAVY, ARMY, Risk Management Framework (RMF), OMB M-19-03, HIPAA, OMB, Homeland Security Act, Gramm-Leach Bliley Act, PII, PIA, FIPS, NSTISSP, NASA, FAR, CFAA, laws and regulations; Reviewing information technology standards and practices to assure compliance with laws and regulations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2019 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |