USPTO serial 88346620
OSKUL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OSKUL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Paramount, CA
Paramount, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore S. Lee
Theodore S. Lee INHOUSE CO. LAW FIRM324 S. DIAMOND BAR BLVD, 318DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, bandanas, baseball caps, beanies, belts, berets, boxer shorts, caps, headwear, infant wear, jackets, leather jackets, pullovers, rain jackets, socks, sweat pants, sweat shirts, sweat shorts, sweat suits, t-shirts, and hoodies | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | Electric oral vaporizers for vaping or smoking purposes; structural parts for electronic vaporizers for smoking purposes, namely, atomizers, electronic vaporizer mods, bumpers, caps, cartridges, clearomizers, coils, cones, drip tips, refilling tools, tanks; cartomizers, namely, combination electric vaporizer refill cartridges sold empty and atomizers, sold as a component of electronic cigarettes; kits for electronic oral vaporizers for smoking purposes comprising electronic oral vaporizers for smoking purposes and refill cartridges for electric oral vaporizers for smoking purposes sold empty; vape mods, namely, accessories in the form of oral electronic devices for smoking purposes for vaporizing e-liquid; Electronic cigarette refill cartridges sold empty; Atomizers and wires for atomizers, sold as a component of oral vaporizers for vaping; Electric vaporizers for the ingestion and inhalation of cannabidiol (CBD) derived from hemp; tobacco substitutes; tobacco substitutes including CBD derived from hemp; pipes for smoking; vape pens being oral electronic vaporizers for smoking purposes; disposable vape pens being oral electronic vaporizers for smoking purposes; e-cigarettes; Wraps for smoking purposes being cigarette rolling papers; Wraps for smoking purposes made of hemp being cigarette rolling papers; and Grinders for smoking purposes for grinding tobacco or hemp; Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of flavorings in liquid form, other than essential oils, used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; Liquid nicotine solutions for use in electronic cigarettes; Chemical flavorings in liquid form used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; vaping oil containing plant extract for use with electronic oral vaporizers for smoking purposes; Electric vaporizer liquid (e-liquid) comprised of propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, and food flavorings in liquid form used to refill electric vaporizers; Nicotine based liquids, namely, liquid nicotine use to refill electronic cigarettes, and nicotine salts; Electronic vaporizer liquid containing CBD derived from industrial hemp for use in electronic oral vaporizers for smoking purposes; all of the aforementioned goods solely derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis or exclusively for use with hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; cases for electronic oral vaporizers for smoking purposes; ashtrays | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 9, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |