USPTO serial 88348018
I-AIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with I-AIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS D. BRATSCHUN
THOMAS D. BRATSCHUN ADSERO IP8210 SOUTHPARK TERRACELITTLETON, CO 80120UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Air treatment equipment, namely, air filters, air humidifiers, air purifiers, air sterilizers; air handling installations; ionization apparatus for the treatment of air or water | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |