USPTO serial 88348902
MASTERCARD TRACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINSON, JENNIFER ELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MASTERCARD TRACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lauren Beth Emerson
LAUREN EMERSON LEASON ELLLIS LLPONE BARKER AVENUE, 5TH FLOORWHITE PLAINS, NY 10601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Consultation in the field of procurement of goods and services, and financial record-keeping for regulatory compliance purposes; Information services, namely, providing information in the field of procurement of goods and services, and financial record-keeping for regulatory compliance purposes; Business risk management services; payment facilitation, namely, digital invoicing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer, ACH, credit card, debit card, and electronic payments for businesses and financial risk management services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing non-downloadable software as a service for use in business analysis in the nature of analysis of business-to-business transactions, supplier management in the nature of managing payment preferences of suppliers, payment facilitation in the nature of digital invoicing, processing of electronic funds transfer, ACH, credit card, debit card, and electronic payments for businesses, financial risk management, and compliance; application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for business analysis in the nature of analysis of business-to-business transactions, supplier management in the nature of managing payment preferences of suppliers, payment facilitation in the nature of digital invoicing, processing of electronic funds transfer, ACH, credit card, debit card, and electronic payments for businesses, financial risk management and regulatory compliance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 18, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 18, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |