Drawing for MADECASOLE

USPTO serial 88350590

MADECASOLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERLIN, JUSTIN E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MADECASOLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rick Ruz, Esq.

Rick Ruz, Esq. RUZ & RUZ, PL255 Alhambra Cir., Suite 500Coral Gables, FL 33134UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Medicated body powderACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 2, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2021TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 1, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 26, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 7, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 5, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 26, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 31, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2020MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 2020RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED—
Feb 24, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 24, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 13, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 13, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 13, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 3, 2019GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2019GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2019EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Jun 3, 2019CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance