CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for RIKITIKI ELITE LITE

USPTO serial 88351873

RIKITIKI ELITE LITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIKITIKI ELITE LITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas W. Brooke

Thomas W. Brooke HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP800 17TH STREET NWSUITE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Cookies; CrackersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 19, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 19, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 19, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 19, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 17, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 21, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 19, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 19, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 19, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 19, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 24, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 21, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 9, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 22, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance