USPTO serial 88352149
EXACQ CLOUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- XU, ELAINE YILIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXACQ CLOUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Neuhausen am Rheinfall, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Parent
Victor von Bruns-Strasse 21Neuhausen am Rheinfall, 8212SWITZERLANDGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | platform as a service (PAAS) featuring a computer software platform for use in video capturing, cloud storage, management, and distribution of video surveillance content; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable computer database software for submission and remote management of surveillance video content through computers, smartphones, and tablets for home, commercial building, personal property, and physical security purposes; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software that provides remote access to video surveillance systems used to monitor security in homes and commercial buildings; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for monitoring surveillance video; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software that enables users to identify surveillance locations and monitor video and surveillance system status; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for interactive video surveillance mapping; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for managing, reporting and trouble-shooting video surveillance systems for homes and commercial buildings; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software that enables users to securely transmit and store surveillance video content; application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for integration of live and recorded surveillance video content into websites; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software to connect web enabled devices to video surveillance security cloud networks to permit users to access, stream and share live surveillance video content | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |