USPTO serial 88352905
ARC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUKER, RACHEL EVE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GRACE HAN STANTON
GRACE HAN STANTON PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Dissemination of advertising services provided on an interactive map of an aircraft inflight entertainment system, namely, providing business information concerning the goods and services of others via local and global computer networks; dissemination of advertisements and commercial announcements for others via Internet and portable communications apparatus on an interactive map; dissemination advertising and promotional services, namely, placing advertisements and promotional displays in electronic sites accessed via computer networks inflight dissemination of advertising and promotional services for others, namely, placing advertisements and promotional displays for others in electronic sites accessed via computer networks inflight; dissemination of third party advertising matter, namely, providing advertising and graphic, multi-media and interactive images through computer networks for use by consumers inflight; placing advertisements and promotional displays in electronic sites accessed via computer networks inflight; providing spaces on websites on the Internet for inflight advertising goods and services for others; dissemination advertisement for others on the Internet accessed inflight | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2020 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 1, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 30, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |