Drawing for SAYAYIN

USPTO serial 88353964

SAYAYIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SIRIGNANO, EMMA MARIE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAYAYIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John G. Bisbikis

John G. Bisbikis Prospect Law LLP120 North LaSalle StreetSuite 2000Chicago, IL 60602

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Canned peanuts; Processed peanuts; Roasted peanuts; Spicy peanutsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2021PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 2, 2021PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Apr 30, 2021APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 6, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 12, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2020PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 11, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 10, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 14, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 25, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 27, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance