USPTO serial 88354041
COOAU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, CLINTON J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COOAU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEVASENA REDDY
1570 HERITAGE BAY DRIVESAN JOSE, CA 95138UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Beauty masks; Cologne water; Cosmetic pencils; Cosmetic preparations for baths; Cosmetics; Cosmetics for animals; Cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes; Cotton wool for cosmetic purposes; Cream for whitening the skin; Dentifrices; Deodorants for human beings or for animals; Depilatories; Depilatory preparations; Eau de cologne; Eyebrow cosmetics; Eyeshadows; False eyelashes; False nails; Hair colorants; Hair dyes; Hair straightening preparations; Lipsticks; Lotions for cosmetic purposes; Make-up powder; Make-up preparations; Nail care preparations; Nail polish; Nail varnishes; Perfumes; Sachets for perfuming linen; Skin whitening creams; Spray cleaners for freshening athletic mouth guards | ABANDONED | Feb 16, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |