USPTO serial 88354073
BIBABO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOLANO, CARLITA JAYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIBABO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wei Yang
245 Meadow Pine PlSan Jose, CA 95125UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Abrading tools; Apparatus for tattooing; Beard clippers; Bread knives; Ceramic knives; Depilation appliances, electric and non-electric; Displacement pump sprayers attached to a garden hose for spraying liquid herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers and insecticides; Drawing knives; Ear-piercing apparatus; Egg slicers, non-electric; Eyelash curlers; Filleting knives; Fingernail polishers, electric or non-electric; Flat irons; Forks being tableware; Fruit knives; Gardening tools, namely, trowels, weeding forks, spades, hoes; Hair-removing tweezers; Hair clippers for personal use, electric and non-electric; Hand-operated agricultural implements, namely, broadforks; Hand-operated agricultural implements, namely, chicken pluckers; Hand-operated agricultural implements, namely, cider presses; Hand-operated caulking guns; Hand-operated cutting tools; Hand-operated lasts for shoemaking; Hand-operated riveting tools; Hand-operated sprayers for insecticide; Hand-operated tools, namely, chisels; Hand-operated vegetable shredders; Hand tools, namely, fruit pickers; Hand tools, namely, hand-operated pumps; Hand tools, namely, abrading instruments; Hand tools, namely, electric hair curling irons; Ice picks; Kitchen knives; Knife sharpeners; Knives being tableware; Manicure sets; Manicure sets, electric; Manually operated tree pruners; Nail clippers, electric or non-electric; Nail files; Non-electric caulking guns; Non-electric cheese slicers; Pedicure sets; Penknives; Pizza cutters, non-electric; Razor blades; Razor cases; Razors, electric or non-electric; Scaling knives; Scissors; Sharpening stones; Shaving cases; Shoe lasts being hand tools; Spoons being tableware; Table cutlery, namely, forks, knives; Table forks; Vegetable knives; Vegetable slicers; Hand tools, namely, scrapers | ACTIVE | Jan 8, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2022 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2021 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2020 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |