Drawing for NETWORK PRESENCE SENSING

USPTO serial 88354318

NETWORK PRESENCE SENSING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EBAUGH, MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NETWORK PRESENCE SENSING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KIRK A. DAMMAN

KIRK A. DAMMAN LEWIS RICE LLCBOX IP DEPARTMENT600 WASHINGTON AVENUE, SUITE 2500ST. LOUIS, MO 63101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and downloadable computer firmware to analyze data to detect human presence within an areaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 31, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 31, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 31, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 15, 2021EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 6, 2020GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2020GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2020CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 24, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 23, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 6, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 6, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 6, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 6, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 6, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 6, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance