USPTO serial 88354422
TRAVELSTOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARPER, HANNAH B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRAVELSTOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gloria Tsui-Yip
Gloria Tsui-Yip GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, P.C.270 MADISON AVE. 8TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable digital photographs and illustrations; texts and written articles in the field of travel and photography; sound clips, video clips, and audio recordings in the field of travel and photography; Downloadable video recordings featuring travel and photography; computer graphics, layout and design templates; recorded computer search engine and photo hosting software | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Rental of advertising spaces; online retail store services featuring texts, photos, illustrations, sound clips, video clips, fonts and graphics via downloads from databases; online retail store services featuring downloadable layouts and design templates | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software; rental of computer software; providing of information on computer technology and programming in the fields of digital design tools, software for digital media, creative processes and methods and processes in connection with creating, editing and use of photos, texts, illustrations, sounds clips, video clips, graphics, layout and design templates | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing of intellectual property rights, namely, to the use of texts, photos, illustrations, sound clips, video clips, graphics, layout and design templates via downloads from databases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Zine Media AS
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named TRAVELSTOCK
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |