USPTO serial 88355175
LA MADELEINE ·BIENVENUE· WELCOME· BON APPETIT· EAT WELL·
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRATER, JILL I
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LA MADELEINE ·BIENVENUE· WELCOME· BON APPETIT· EAT WELL·?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly Buck Richard
Molly Buck Richard RICHARD LAW GROUP13355 Noel Rd, Suite 1350DALLAS, TX 75240UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Soups, broths, salads, namely, fruit salads, poultry salads, meat salads, potato salads, fish salads, vegetable salads and garden salads | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Fresh bakery goods, namely, breads, croissants, danishes, buns, pizzas, bread dough, quiches, pastries, muffins, cookies, doughnuts, fruit turnovers, fresh bakery goods for snacking, none of the foregoing to be sold in a pre-packaged format; Frozen bakery goods, namely, breads, croissants, danishes, buns, pizzas, bread dough, quiches, pastries, muffins, cookies, doughnuts, fruit turnovers, none of the foregoing to be sold in a pre-packaged format; crepes, sandwiches; salads, namely, macaroni salads, rice salads, pasta salads; tea; prepared entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; iced tea; coffee; coffee flavoured ices, espresso-based beverages, namely, lattes, mochas and espressos; hot chocolate | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by La Madeleine, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by La Madeleine, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named LA MADELEINE ·BIENVENUE· WELCOME· BON APPETIT· EAT WELL·
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2021 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 26, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2020 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |