USPTO serial 88355572
UNIQUE IN THE CREEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
Status 686 means your mark is published in the USPTO Official Gazette and in the 30-day opposition period. If no opposition is filed, prosecution typically continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. Monitor the opposition window. After it closes, watch for Notice of Allowance (intent-to-use) or registration (use-based).
Need help with UNIQUE IN THE CREEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Stoney Creek, Ontario, CA
Stoney Creek, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles J. Meyer
Charles J. Meyer Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wagner, LLP111 Monument Circle, Suite 3700Indianapolis, IN 46204United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | Artificial wreaths and structural boards, parts, accessories and supplies used in the manufacture thereof; Artificial flowers, and structural boards, parts, accessories, and supplies used in the manufacture thereof | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Operating affiliate programs, namely, custom manufacturing of wreaths, centerpieces, decorations, ornaments, wall décor, candle holders, table runners and artificial flowers to the order and specification of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, classes, courses in the field of making wreaths, patterns for wreaths, centerpieces, patterns for centerpieces, decorations, patterns for decorations, ornaments, patterns for ornaments, wall décor, patterns for wall décor, candle holders, patterns for candle holders, floating decor, patterns for floating décor, table runners, patterns for table runners, artificial flowers, patterns for artificial flowers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UNIQUE IN THE CREEK LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by UNIQUE IN THE CREEK LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named UNIQUE IN THE CREEK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 3, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 11, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |