Drawing for AIBLUE

USPTO serial 88355811

AIBLUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ASKEW, MEGAN RUTH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIBLUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CYDNEY A. TUNE

CYDNEY A. TUNE PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLPP.O. BOX 2824Calendar/Docketing DepartmentSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94126-2824

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Global positing system (GPS); GPS receivers; GPS navigation device; GPS tracking device; electronic navigational devices, namely, global positioning satellite (GPS) based navigation receivers; global positioning systems comprised of computers, transmitters, network interface devices, GPS receivers, antennas, and a LCD display; portable personal navigation devices; wireless communication radios; apparatus for recording and reproduction of data; protective carrying cases specially adapted for global positioning system (GPS) apparatus; sound alarms; downloadable software for controlling and managing access server applications; recorded software for controlling and managing access server applications; masts for wireless aerials; signal lights in the nature of rotating lights; transmitters of electronic signals; satellite radio receivers; antennasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 3, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 6, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 17, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 22, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance