USPTO serial 88357304
PINPOINT PHARMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCLEIDOROVICH, JOANNA YAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PINPOINT PHARMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grayslake, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian Elman
Brian Elman SHIMANOVSKY & MOSCARDINI130 S. JEFFERSON ST.SUITE 350CHICAGO, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Employment hiring, recruiting, placement, staffing and career networking services; Managing the ordering and hiring of additional staff for others; Placement of staff; Providing an employer with candidates or potential employees to fill temporary, contract and permanent positions; Providing business support staff services; Providing office support staff services; Providing virtual on-line office support staff services for businesses | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2021 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| May 26, 2021 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |