Drawing for EASTRICH

USPTO serial 88357696

EASTRICH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BICE, DANIEL TRAVIS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EASTRICH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Trudie Katz Walker

225 OLD COUNTRY ROAD South Bldg.MELVILLE, NY 11747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial consulting services, namely, expert analysis in finance; information, advisory, consultancy and research services relating to finance and investments; financing of investments; financial portfolio management; acquisition for financial investment in the nature of asset allocation; financial investment fund transfer, management and transaction services; financial investment management services; financial management relating to investments; financial analysis; financial forecasting; financial advice; financial researchACTIVEJul 1, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 8, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 14, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 4, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 26, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2019GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2019GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2019EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Nov 27, 2019CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Nov 19, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2019GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 12, 2019GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 12, 2019CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 5, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance