Drawing for SIFT

USPTO serial 88358055

SIFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ELIZABETH A. WALKER

ELIZABETH A. WALKER DANIELSON LEGAL LLCONE MIFFLIN PLACE, SUITE 400CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable software development kits (SDK); recorded software development kits (SDK)ACTIVEJan 29, 2019

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 4, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 4, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 23, 2020EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 7, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 5, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 5, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 5, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 4, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 4, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 4, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 13, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance