Drawing for BUILT TO SEND IT

USPTO serial 88358395

BUILT TO SEND IT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUILT TO SEND IT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katherine M. Basile

Katherine M. Basile Reed Smith LLPP.O. Box 488Pittsburgh, PA 15230UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Eyewear; Goggles for sports; Protective helmets; Safety goggles; SunglassesACTIVE—
025Button down shirts; Jackets; Jerseys; Pants; Polo shirts; Shorts; Sweatshirts; T-shirtsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 14, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 14, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 18, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 29, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 13, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 11, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 11, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 3, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 7, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance