Drawing for SATBRIDGE

USPTO serial 88359618

SATBRIDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SATBRIDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tammy J. Dunn

TAMMY J. DUNN OSHA LIANG LLP909 FANNIN STREET, SUITE 3500HOUSTON, TX 77010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Satellite transceivers and antennas; computer hardware and downloadable computer software for satellite communications; downloadable computer application software for voice over internet protocol (VOIP)ACTIVE—
038Satellite communication services; voice over internet protocol (VOIP) services; Communication services, namely, transmission of voice, audio, visual images and data by telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, the Internet, information services networks and data networksACTIVE—
042software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software platforms for analyzing and managing satellite communications network data and for providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software development tools for satellite communicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 26, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 1, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 11, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 13, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 13, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 11, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 25, 2019PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 6, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance