USPTO serial 88359791
CORTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER, JUSTIN T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CORTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne Hiaring Hocking
Anne Hiaring Hocking DONAHUE FITZGERALD LLP1999 Harrison Street26th FloorOakland, CA 94612Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Automotive exhaust mufflers, silencers, resonance chambers; Automotive exhaust systems comprised of pipes, collectors, mufflers and particulate traps; Automotive exhaust system fabrication components, namely, bent exhaust tubing, exhaust collectors, Y pipes, X pipes, H pipes, exhaust flanges, exhaust gaskets, exhaust clamps, exhaust brackets, exhaust flex couplings | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, coats, jackets, sweatshirts, tank tops and hoodies; headwear, namely, hats and caps | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Online retail store services featuring automotive exhaust mufflers, silencers, resonance chambers, automotive exhaust systems and automotive exhaust system components; Online retail store services featuring clothing and headgear; retail store services featuring clothing and headgear; retail store services featuring automotive exhaust mufflers, silencers, resonance chambers, automotive exhaust systems and automotive exhaust system components | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacturing of automotive exhaust mufflers, silencers, resonance chambers, automotive exhaust systems and automotive exhaust system components; Metal fabrication and finishing services for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cortek Exhaust Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named CORTEK
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |