Drawing for PLAYTIME

USPTO serial 88359895

PLAYTIME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLAYTIME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY L VAN HOOSEAR

JEFFREY L VAN HOOSEAR KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN STREET 14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Hosting social entertainment events, namely, video game events, tournaments and competitions, for others; entertainment services, namely, organizing and conducting video game events, tournaments and competitions; providing a venue for watching live and streaming esports events, tournaments and competitions; providing a web site featuring information about videogame tournaments, events, and competitionsACTIVEMar 24, 2019

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 12, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 8, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 7, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 8, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 8, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 8, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 29, 2021EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 3, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 20, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 7, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 7, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 7, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 7, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 13, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance