USPTO serial 88366633
SENSORY NOOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DETMER, CAROLYN ROSE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SENSORY NOOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DARRIN A AUITO
DARRIN A AUITO HEA LAW PLLC8000 TOWERS CRESCENT DRIVESUITE 1575MCLEAN, VA 22182Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Modular meeting units, namely, prefabricated non-metal structures consisting of workstations; mobile meeting units, namely, prefabricated non-metal structures consisting of workstations; mobile modular meeting units, namely, prefabricated non-metal structures consisting of workstations; modular dining units, namely, prefabricated non-metal structures consisting of dining spaces; mobile dining units, namely, prefabricated non-metal structures consisting of dining spaces; mobile modular dining units, namely, prefabricated non-metal structures consisting of dining spaces; modular units, namely, prefabricated non-metal structures consisting of workstations and dining spaces, configured to connect to like modular units; mobile units, namely, prefabricated non-metal structures consisting of workstations and dining spaces, configured to connect to like mobile units; mobile modular units, namely, prefabricated non-metal structures consisting of workstations and dining spaces, configured to connect to like mobile modular units; modular meeting unit, namely, prefabricated non-metal structures consisting of a workplace including a sitting area, worktop surface, integrated electronics, lighting, sound dampening panels, and lockable castors; mobile meeting unit, namely, prefabricated non-metal structures consisting of a workplace including a sitting area, worktop surface, integrated electronics, lighting, sound dampening panels, and lockable castors; mobile modular meeting unit, namely, prefabricated non-metal structures consisting of a workplace including a sitting area, worktop surface, integrated electronics, lighting, sound dampening panels, and lockable castors | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2026 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 20, 2026 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |