USPTO serial 88370154
TICKTOCKTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TICKTOCKTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. Dale Langley, Jr.
H. Dale Langley, Jr. The Law Firm of H. Dale Langley, Jr., P.C.1803 West AvenueAustin, TX 78701United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Computer repair, namely, repair of laptop, desktop, and tablet computers; Troubleshooting in the nature of repair of computer hardware, namely, printer troubleshooting and repair; Computer setups, namely, installation of computer hardware; Computer updating, namely, installation of upgraded computer hardware; Smarthome technology installation, namely, installation of security cameras, doorbell cameras, smart plugs, smart locks, window sensors, door sensors, hazard sensors, motion detectors, climate controls, and remote monitoring systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer setups, namely, installation of computer software; Computer maintenace, namely, performing software upgrades and updates; Remote computer support, namely, remote assistance with computer software technical problems; Remote computer support, namely, remote assistance with computer hardware technical problems; Remote computer support, namely, remote assistance with computer technical problems, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software technical problems; Onsite computer support, namely, in person assistance with computer software technical problems; Onsite computer support, namely, in person assistance with computer hardware technical problems; Onsite computer support, namely, in person assistance with computer technical problems, namely, in person troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software technical problems; Computer and communication hardware and software network design; Integration of computer systems and communications networks; Network integration of wired, wireless, and cellular networks; Computer services, namely, application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for data retrieval, malware removal, virus removal, wireless internet security solutions, namely, in person troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing wireless internet hardware and software security problems, and monitoring internet traffic; Computer backup and recovery services featuring strategic technology plans and emergency disaster recovery services for computers, namely, remote computer backup services, back up services for computer hard drive data, and recovery of computer data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |