USPTO serial 88370248
MOLD AUTHORITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOLD AUTHORITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian A. Lincer
Brian A. Lincer THE INTERNICOLA LAW FIRM, P.C.115 Maple AvenueRed bank, NJ 07701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Mold remediation services; Odor neutralization services; Water treatment services; Consulting services in the field of water treatment; Environmental remediation services, namely, treatment of mold, asbestos, fire and smoke, water and flood damage; Industrial vacuum mold remediation services; Mold remediation services using chemical treatment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 23, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2021 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2021 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 23, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 14, 2019 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2019 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |