USPTO serial 88370702
FEIMUOSI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 6072462Status 783
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 9, 2020
- Examiner
- SHINN, LAUREN DONGMI
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FEIMUOSI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shenzhen Feimusi E-commerce Co., Ltd.
Dist.,Shenzhen, CN
Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Feimusi E-commerce Co., Ltd.
Shenzhen Feimusi E-commerce Co., Ltd.
Dist.,Shenzhen, CN
Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Feimusi E-commerce Co., Ltd.
Shenzhen Feimusi E-commerce Co., Ltd.
Dist.,Shenzhen, CN
Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Feimusi E-commerce Co., Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Zhengyan Chang
Zhengyan Chang YC Law Group, PC2880 Zanker Road, Suite 203-USPSan Jose, CA 95134UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Curling tongs; Depilatory appliances; Electric beard trimmers; Electric hair crimper; Electric hair curling irons; Electric hair straightener; Electric manicure sets; Electric pedicure sets; Electric razors and electric hair clippers; Electric and battery-powered hair trimmers; Eyelash curlers; Fingernail polishers, electric or non-electric; Flat irons, electric; Hair clippers; Spanners | — | Jul 3, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Feimusi E-commerce Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Feimusi E-commerce Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Feimusi E-commerce Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named FEIMUOSI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2025 | KRNT | NOTICE OF TERMINATION – EMAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | KRRT | TERMINATED AFTER SANCTIONS | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | KONO | ORDER FOR SANCTIONS - NOTICE EMAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | KOFS | ORDER FOR SANCTIONS | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | KRCC | RECONSIDERED – CANCELLED AND REOPENED | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | KRRE | ORDER RECONSIDERING REGISTRATION – NOTICE EMAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | KORR | ORDER RECONSIDERING REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | KORN | NOTICE PROPOSING TO RECONSIDER REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | KNPR | NOTICE PROPOSING TO RECONSIDER REGISTRATION – EMAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2023 | KSCO | SHOW CAUSE ORDER | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | KSCO | SHOW CAUSE ORDER | — |
| May 20, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2021 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2021 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 24, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |