CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ARTISTS FOR OCEANS

USPTO serial 88372384

ARTISTS FOR OCEANS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARTISTS FOR OCEANS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laurence Singer

46-60 156TH STREETFLUSHING, NY 11355UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Recreations in the nature of custom manufacture of mosaics featuring work of marine artists for use in mosaic tile, pool tile, swimming pool mosaics, mosaic murals, custom mosaic designs and print reproductionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 3, 2022EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 3, 2022EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 3, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2022EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2021TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 17, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 5, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 16, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2021TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 11, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 11, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 10, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 9, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 5, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 5, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 10, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 13, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 23, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 21, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 21, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 27, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance