USPTO serial 88373896
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
South Plainfield, NJ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JACOB PARGAMENT
JACOB PARGAMENT GARSON SEGAL STEINMETZ FLADGATE LLP164 WEST 25TH STREET SUITE 11RNEW YORK, NY 10001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Aloe vera gel for cosmetic purposes; Argan oil for cosmetic purposes; Bar soap; Bath bombs; Bath gel; Beauty soap; Body oils; Body scrub; Castor oil for cosmetic purposes; Cocoa butter for cosmetic purposes; Coconut oil for cosmetic purposes; Essential oils for aromatherapy use; Eye gels; Facial masks; Hair masks; Hair oils; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Lip balm; Massage oils; Non-medicated beard care preparations, namely, cream, lotions, oils; Non-medicated facial and eye serum containing antioxidants; Skin moisturizer; Tea tree oil; Cosmetic body scrubs for the face, feet, hands, and body | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 11, 2020 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2020 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2020 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 12, 2020 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |