USPTO serial 88374105
4D SAFEHALO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORNDORFF, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 4D SAFEHALO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea Shannon
Andrea Shannon NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP1301 MCKINNEY, SUITE 5100Houston, TX 77010-3095UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software applications for use in the field of distracted driving, namely, software applications installed on handheld electronic devices for selectively disabling or interrupting communications and other functionality on the device when the user of the device is operating a motor vehicle; Computer hardware for use in the field of distracted driving, namely, hardware installed in motor vehicles for acquiring, receiving, storing, processing, and using vehicle data and for communicating such vehicle data to the handheld electronic device of the operator of the vehicle; Computer hardware for use in the field of distracted driving, namely, hardware installed in motor vehicles for the purpose of determining the proximate location of handheld electronic devices within the vehicle and communicating such data to the handheld electronic device of the operator of the vehicle | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing an Internet portal for use in the field of distracted driving, namely, providing an Internet portal for the purpose of controlling, monitoring, and managing use of handheld electronic devices by operators of motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 11, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 10, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |