USPTO serial 88377268
HOUSE OF ERMIAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DANTZLER, LAUREN ALEXANDRIA
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOUSE OF ERMIAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services featuring arts and crafts products; Retail store services featuring cannabis and CBD products specifically, cannabis and CBD infused cosmetic and beauty products, all of the foregoing services featuring products containing CBD derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Retail cannabis, CBD and arts and crafts stores specifically featuring arts and crafts products, and cannabis and CBD infused cosmetic and beauty products, all of the foregoing services featuring products containing CBD derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Specialized retail pharmacy services for patients with particular medical conditions, not featuring products containing cannabis, hemp, marijuana or CBD; On- line retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others, not featuring products containing cannabis, hemp, marijuana or CBD; Retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others, not featuring products containing cannabis, hemp, marijuana or CBD; Arranging and conducting special events for commercial, promotional or advertising purposes, not including distribution of products containing cannabis, hemp, marijuana or CBD | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2022 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2021 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2021 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 23, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2021 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 23, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 23, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 24, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 4, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |