USPTO serial 88377275
KUSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KUSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ridgefield, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfume; Perfume oils; Perfume oils for the manufacture of cosmetic preparations; Perfumed creams; Perfumed extracts for tissues and perfumes; Perfumed paste; Perfumed powder; Perfumed powders; Perfumed soap; Perfumed soaps; Perfumed talcum powder; Perfumes; Perfumes and colognes; Perfumes and toilet waters; Perfumes for industrial purposes; Perfumes in solid form; Perfumes, aftershaves and colognes; Perfumes, eau de colognes and aftershaves; Perfumes, eaux de cologne and aftershaves; Perfuming sachets; Amber being perfume; Colognes, perfumes and cosmetics; Cosmetics in general, including perfumes; Eau de perfume; Essential oils as perfume for laundry purposes; Extracts of flowers being perfumes; Ionone being perfume; Liquid perfumes; Oils for perfumes and scents; Sachets for perfuming linen | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2021 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |