USPTO serial 88378007
TALOFLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 9, 2024
- Examiner
- BLACK, MILDRED ELIZABETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with TALOFLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
SANTA MONICA, CA
SANTA MONICA, CA
SANTA MONICA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean McChesney
Sean McChesney Focal PLLC900 1st Avenue S., Ste. 201Seattle, WA 98134UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic books in the field of multi-cloud and cloud deployments; Downloadable computer software instruction manuals in electronic format; Downloadable digital video recordings containing instructional video on use of computer software; DVDs containing recordings of instructional video on use of computer software | ACTIVE | Dec 5, 2021 |
| 042 | Non-downloadable online digital video recordings containing instructional video on use of computer software; Computer software testing and routing for development, analysis and debugging of enterprise software architectures for prevention, mitigation, resolution and prediction of enterprise operational incidents to improve and enhance business efficacy; Providing online nondownloadable cloud computing software and platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for development, deployment, execution and management of scalable event-driven software utilizing online non-downloadable server less frameworks and micro service architectures, namely, online non-downloadable software that provides computer code analysis, automation and automatic remediation of problems for accelerating the development of software components and architectures, the aforementioned services being in the field of evaluation developer tools and cloud infrastructure tools; Design and development of computer software; Computer system and computer software integration services; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for building rules, rules engine applications, specifications and deployment solutions for business automation and business operational event automation, the aforementioned services being in the field of evaluation developer tools and cloud infrastructure tools; Platform as a service (PaaS) featuring a business logic computer software platform for business automation and business operational event automation, the aforementioned services being in the field of evaluation developer tools and cloud infrastructure tools; Cloud computing featuring software for cloud-based development environmental for re-usable software business logic, the aforementioned services being in the field of evaluation developer tools and cloud infrastructure tools; Design, installation, updating and maintenance of computer software; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for implementation, managing, reporting, processing and organizing of activities and tasks performed by businesses and individuals, the aforementioned services being in the field of evaluation developer tools and cloud infrastructure tools; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use implementation, managing, reporting, processing and organizing of activities and tasks performed by businesses and individuals, the aforementioned services being in the field of evaluation developer tools and cloud infrastructure tools; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use implementation, managing, reporting, processing and organizing of activities and tasks performed by businesses and individuals, the aforementioned services being in the field of evaluation developer tools and cloud infrastructure tools; Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management and knowledge management to host computer application software for the purpose of implementation, managing, reporting, processing and organizing of activities and tasks performed by businesses and individuals, the aforementioned services being in the field of evaluation developer tools and cloud infrastructure tools; Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for implementation, managing, reporting, processing and organizing of activities and tasks performed by businesses and individuals, the aforementioned services being in the field of evaluation developer tools and cloud infrastructure tools; Providing online non-downloadable computer software and non-downloadable platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in the fields of microservice architectures, serverless architectures, and event-driven systems and architectures, namely, computer software and computer software platform for monitoring, tracking, tracing, preventing, mitigating, solving, debugging and predicting enterprise operational incidents, the aforementioned services being in the field of evaluation developer tools and cloud infrastructure tools; Providing online non-downloadable computer software and online non-downloadable computer software application for designing and running development programs and application programs in a common development environment, the aforementioned services being in the field of evaluation developer tools and cloud infrastructure tools; Providing online non-downloadable computer software for automation of allocation and optimization of cloud computing resources; Providing online non-downloadable computer software for governance and compliance of cloud computing, the aforementioned services being in the field of evaluation developer tools and cloud infrastructure tools | ACTIVE | Aug 8, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LocoNoco Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TALOFLOW INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TALOFLOW INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TALOFLOW INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TALOFLOW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2024 | NRCC | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 7, 2023 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2023 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 2, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 7, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 21, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2020 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 24, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |