Drawing for MINGLE CITY

USPTO serial 88379006

MINGLE CITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MINGLE CITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrea H. Evans

Andrea H. Evans THE LAW FIRM OF ANDREA HENCE EVANS, LLC14625 BALTIMORE AVE. #853LAUREL, MD 20707UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business networking; Providing an on-line searchable database featuring employment opportunities and content about employmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 4, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2020NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 26, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 8, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 8, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 6, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 8, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 13, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 28, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance