USPTO serial 88386921
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
St. Louis, MO
St. Louis, MO
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew R. Wilmot
Matthew R. Wilmot STOEL RIVES LLP760 SW NINTH AVENUE, SUITE 3000PORTLAND, OR 97205UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Automotive, industrial, and navigation safety-warning lights, namely, strobes, rotating lights, and bar lights; Emergency warning lights, bells, and horns; Electric warning light systems; Lighting control apparatus and panels; Security lighting systems for vehicles using radio frequency devices; Devices for wireless radio transmission; Remote control transmitter for radio-controlled devices; Wireless controllers to remotely monitor and control the function and status of other electrical, electronic, and mechanical devices or systems, namely, lighting systems and security systems; Radio lightwave data links; Vehicle locating, tracking, and security system comprised of an antenna and radio transmitter to be placed in a vehicle; Radio transmitters, receivers, and controllers for monitoring and controlling automotive lighting; Vehicle tracking devices comprised of cellular radio modules, computer hardware, computer software, sensors, transmitters, receivers, and global positioning satellite receivers, all for use in connection with vehicle tracking, vehicle monitoring, and anti-theft vehicle alarms; Safety and driving assistant system for mobile vehicles and vessels comprised of electronic proximity sensors and switches, high-resolution cameras, integrated circuits for the purpose of imaging processing, and display monitors; Vehicle locator and recovery device programmed to use global positioning systems (GPS) and cellular telecommunications; Vehicle safety equipment, namely, back-up sensors and cameras; Vehicle safety equipment, namely, electronic deer alerts; Vehicle safety equipment, namely, electronic tire pressure monitors; Vehicle detection equipment, namely, display monitors, computers, image sensors, video cameras, and operating system and application software to detect vehicle location; Electronic devices for detecting and locating vehicles using dedicated short-range communication (DSRC) radio frequency, global positioning systems, and cellular communication networks; Electronic communications systems comprised of computer hardware and software for the transmission of data between two points; Wireless communication devices for data transmission; Apparatus for transmission of communication; Antennas for wireless communications apparatus; Warning devices and systems for motor vehicles, namely, surface acoustic wave sensors, proximity sensors, acoustic alarms, and acoustic amplifiers for warning pedestrians of the existence of motor vehicles in close proximity; Sensors and detector units for use in controlling the actuation and operation of automotive safety apparatus and equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Light bars for vehicles, namely, police, fire, and emergency vehicles; Lighting apparatus for vehicles; Lights for vehicles; Lighting installations | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 15, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2019 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |