Drawing for EOSLINK

USPTO serial 88389345

EOSLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EOSLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew T. Hespos

Matthew T. Hespos Hespos & Porco LLPPO Box 68Essex Fells, NJ 07021UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for industrial and scientific use, for recording, transmitting and reproducing sound and images; computers; microscopes; scanners; probes for scientific purposes; recorded computer software for viewing, reproducing, processing, 3D reconstitution, transmitting and analyzing optical images in the field of imagery for medical, veterinary and biological purposes; computer screens; all the forgoing equipment and apparatus for viewing, reproducing, processing, 3D reconstitution, transmitting and analyzing optical images in the field of imagery for medical, veterinary and biological purposes; computer terminals for reviewing medical images taken from scanners, MRI, mammograms, X-rays; recorded computer software for diagnosis, surgical planning, assessment and monitoring of pathologies; medical imaging apparatus for small animals, in a research laboratory environment; electronic apparatus, namely, stand alone displays for medical imagesACTIVE—
010Surgical apparatus and instruments for medical or veterinary use; medical imaging apparatus; medical imaging apparatus; radiological apparatus for diagnostic and medical purposes, namely, magnetic resonance imagerACTIVE—
042Technical consulting services in the field of non-medical, ultrasound imaging; scientific research; design, development, installation and maintenance of computer software, notably for computer software for diagnosis, surgical planning, assessment and monitoring of pathologiesACTIVE—
044technical consulting services in the field of medical imagingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 16, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 23, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 21, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 21, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 25, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 21, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 8, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 7, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 26, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance