USPTO serial 88389428
OBVIOUS WINES NO 01 DARK & BOLD #FRUITFORWARD #MEDIUMBODY #SNOBFREE #SMOOTH 2016 RED BLEND PASO ROBLES, CA OBVIOUS WINES BECAUSE YOU SHOULDN'T NEED A PHD TO DRINK WINE. #DNA ESTATE GROWN IN 2016 IN PAS ROBLES, CA 51% MERLOT + 49% CABERNET SAUVIGNON 100% V
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 11, 2020
- Examiner
- FOSS, KATHERINE M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with OBVIOUS WINES NO 01 DARK & BOLD #FRUITFORWARD #MEDIUMBODY #SNOBFREE #SMOOTH 2016 RED BLEND PASO ROBLES, CA OBVIOUS WINES BECAUSE YOU SHOULDN'T NEED A PHD TO DRINK WINE. #DNA ESTATE GROWN IN 2016 IN PAS ROBLES, CA 51% MERLOT + 49% CABERNET SAUVIGNON 100% V?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $425
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian D. Kaider
Brian D. Kaider KAIDERLAW24230 KINGS VALLEY ROADDAMASCUS, MD 20872UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | ACTIVE | Apr 14, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Obvious Wines LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Obvious Wines LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Obvious Wines LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named OBVIOUS WINES NO 01 DARK & BOLD #FRUITFORWARD #MEDIUMBODY #SNOBFREE #SMOOTH 2016 RED BLEND PASO ROBLES, CA OBVIOUS WINES BECAUSE YOU SHOULDN'T NEED A PHD TO DRINK WINE. #DNA ESTATE GROWN IN 2016 IN PAS ROBLES, CA 51% MERLOT + 49% CABERNET SAUVIGNON 100% V
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 26, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2020 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2019 | CFDG | REQUEST TO CORRECT FILING DATE - GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | RCFR | REQUEST TO CORRECT FILING DATE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2019 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |