USPTO serial 88389478
SEMI WORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEMI WORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Milpitas, CA
Milpitas, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HEATHER A DUNN
HEATHER A DUNN DLA PIPER LLP US555 MISSION STREET, SUITE 2400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2933UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Research and consulting services in the field of careers in the semiconductors and electronics industry; organization of trade shows and business conferences in the field of supply chains, design, development, testing, manufacturing, marketing, and distribution of semiconductors and electronics; organization of trade shows and business conferences for the promotion of employment hiring, recruiting, placement, staffing and networking in the semiconductors and electronics industry; promoting public awareness of the importance of educational and training standards for training and education for careers in the semiconductors and electronics industry; promoting public awareness of the importance of standards in educational materials and curriculum related to semiconductors and electronics' design, development, testing, manufacturing, marketing, and distribution; advertising services, namely, advertising, promotion and marketing of the brands, businesses, profiles, products and services of others pertaining to supply chains, design, development, testing, manufacturing, marketing, and distribution of, and careers in, semiconductors, electronics, and related software, hardware, equipment, and services, and advertising services, namely, advertising, promotion and marketing of the brands, businesses, profiles, products and services of others pertaining to educational materials and curriculum related thereto | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services in the nature of providing trainings, seminars, workshops, and classes in the field of supply chains, design, development, testing, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of semiconductors and electronics, and distribution of training materials in connection therewith; educational services, namely, providing workshops and classes in the field of developing educational materials and curriculum concerning supply chains, design, development, testing, manufacturing, marketing, and distribution of semiconductors and electronics; research services in the field of education, namely, developing educational materials and curriculum for the design, development, testing, and manufacturing of semiconductors and electronics | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Testing, analysis, and evaluation of the educational materials and curriculum of others to determine conformity with certification standards; developing quality control standards for educational materials and curriculum related to supply chain management, design, development, testing, manufacturing, marketing, and distribution of semiconductors and electronics; providing consulting, information and advice regarding certification programs in the field of educational materials and curriculum for training people for careers in the semiconductors and electronics industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 27, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 25, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 30, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 10, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 23, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 11, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2020 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |