Drawing for DRINK MORE BEER

USPTO serial 88389863

DRINK MORE BEER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRINK MORE BEER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH R. FALCON III

JOSEPH R. FALCON III BARLEY SNYDER2 GREAT VALLEY PARKWAYSUITE 110MALVERN, PA 17602

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Non-metal and non-paper closures for containersACTIVEJul 16, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 24, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 24, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 8, 2021EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 24, 2021GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 24, 2021GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 24, 2021CNESSU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN—
Apr 6, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 4, 2021GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2021GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2021CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Dec 9, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 9, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 9, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 9, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 9, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2020CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 19, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 25, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 8, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 28, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 28, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 1, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 6, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 17, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance