Drawing for ROGUE WAVE

USPTO serial 88391568

ROGUE WAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
YI, CRYSTAL HAEIN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROGUE WAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay Begler

Jay Begler NIESAR & VESTAL LLP90 New Montgomery StreetNinth FloorSan Francisco, CA 94105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely vodkaACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2021MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Feb 8, 2021ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Feb 5, 2021EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Feb 4, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 4, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 4, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 4, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 4, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Nov 16, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 18, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 18, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 18, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 18, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Nov 14, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 13, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 13, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 4, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 22, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance