USPTO serial 88393961
YOOFORIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YOOFORIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nadine Y. From
Nadine Y. From From Law, PLLC53 North Moore StreetNew York, NY 10013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Beverages made of coffee; Beverages made of tea; Beverages with a coffee base; Beverages with a tea base; Edible fruit ices; Gum sweets; Gummy candies; Bubble gum; Chewing gum; Chewing gum for breath freshening; Chewing gum with vitamins; Chewing gum, not for medical purposes; Chewing gums; Cocoa-based beverages; Coffee based beverages; Coffee-based beverages; Flavorings for beverages, other than essential oils; Herbal flavourings, other than essential oils, for making beverages; Herbal food beverages; Sugar-free chewing gum; Sugarfree chewing gum; Sugarless chewing gum; Tea-based beverages; Tea-based beverages also containing industrial hemp oil; Tea-based iced beverages; all of the aforementioned goods containing hemp ingredients solely with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Beverages for animals; Beverages for canines; Beverages for pets; Edible cat treats; Edible chews for animals; Edible chews for dogs; Edible dog treats; Edible food for animals for chewing; Edible organic pet treats for joint health, stress relief, relaxation, heart health, mental health, energy, weight loss, for cats and dogs; Edible pet treats for cats and dogs; Edible vegan pet treats for joint health, stress relief, relaxation, heart health, mental health, energy, weight loss for cats and dogs; Pet beverages for cats and dogs; all of the aforementioned goods containing hemp ingredients solely with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beauty beverages, namely, fruit juices and energy drinks containing nutritional supplements; Concentrates and powders used in the preparation of energy drinks and fruit-flavored beverages; Concentrates, syrups or powders for making soft drinks or tea-flavored beverages; Kvass; Non-alcoholic beverages flavored with tea; Non-alcoholic beverages flavoured with tea; Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages; Non-alcoholic malt beverages; Non-alcoholic soda beverages flavoured with tea; Non-alcoholic water-based beverages; Sherbet beverages; Water beverages; all of the aforementioned goods containing hemp ingredients solely with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 18, 2020 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2020 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |