Drawing for VIGO VIDEO

USPTO serial 88395493

VIGO VIDEO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VIGO VIDEO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

B. Brett Heavner

B. Brett Heavner FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER LLP901 New York Avenue NWWashington, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for creating, sharing, disseminating and posting videos for the purposes of social, personal and professional networking; downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for social and personal networking; downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application to enable uploading, creating, posting, editing, showing, displaying, blogging, sharing and transmitting of electronic media in the nature of photographs, videos for entertainment and educational purposes over the Internet; all of the foregoing excluding software relating to alertness, sleepiness, sleep patterns, blinking, eye movement, head movement and all of the foregoing excluding software relating to voice identification and voice verificationACTIVEMar 1, 2018
045online social networking services; providing a social networking website on the Internet for entertainment purposesACTIVEMar 1, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 23, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 23, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 12, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 12, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 25, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 19, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 13, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 20, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 6, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 16, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 10, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance