USPTO serial 88396977
V VALIDIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with V VALIDIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Slaughter, III
KATHRYN G COLE MOORE & VAN ALLEN PLLCBANK OF AMERICA CORPORATE CENTER, 100 NORTH TRYONCHARLOTTE, NC 28202-4003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Cloud computing featuring software to aggregate, integrate, and manage data generated from home health and remote monitoring devices and applications; Cloud computing featuring software to provide integrated workflows, analytics, visualizations, and reporting features to deliver, process, analyze, elevate, and display patient-generated health data (PGHD); Cloud computing featuring software to enable secure, standardized transfer of data from in-home and wearable health devices, health-related smartphone applications, and medical monitoring devices into clinical systems, consumer applications, and health-related programs; Cloud computing featuring software for the use of managing, standardizing, and processing personal health data collected via medical and consumer devices, applications, sensors, and technologies, software supporting the ability to integrate personal health data into databases, systems, platforms, applications, and software that inform health and wellness, and, software that inform preventive wellness, disease management, clinical research, population health, remote monitoring, and care management; Application service provider featuring the use of application programming interfaces (APIs), software developer kits (SDKs), wireless communication, and optical character recognition (OCR) for capturing, aggregating, and integrating health and lifestyle information via cloud and direct connections with medical and consumer devices, applications, sensors, platforms, and operating systems; Platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for the use of collection, aggregation, interpretation, analysis, integration, visualization, notification and distribution of personal health information for the use of remote monitoring, data management, and data analysis; web-based portal for providers and healthcare administrators to build programs, enroll members, automate actions, and visualize/analyze data | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |