Drawing for XL2

USPTO serial 88400557

XL2

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XL2?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles L. Evans

Charles L. Evans OLIVE LAW GROUP, PLLC2500 Regency ParkwayCARY, NC 27518UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical apparatus, namely, a spinal fusion device; Medical devices, namely, spinal implants composed of artificial materials; Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in spinal and orthopedic surgery; Medical instruments, namely, orthopedic apparatus and instruments; Medical, surgical, and orthopedic implants made of artificial materials; Vertebral orthopedic apparatus and systemACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 11, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 7, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 13, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 23, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 5, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 11, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 24, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 5, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance