USPTO serial 88402629
FLIR CITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSEN, BENJAMIN H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLIR CITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark H. Tidman
Mark H. Tidman Baker & Hostetler LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue, NWWashington Square, Suite 1100Washington, DC 20036-5304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware solutions, sensors and sensing solutions, and equipment and components for the operation of smart cities that enhance public safety and security, namely, cameras, electromagnetic radiation imagers, non-medical lasers, non-medical thermal imaging systems being thermal detectors, radar apparatus, electro-optic and electro-acoustic transducers, motion sensors, temperature sensors, electric acoustic sensors, chemical detectors being sensors for measuring the presence or quantity of chemicals, biological detectors being sensors for measuring the presence of or identifying biological contaminants, radiological and nuclear detectors in the nature of radioactivity measuring or identifying apparatus, and explosive detectors, namely, devices comprised of chemical and thermal sensors for the detection of explosives; computer hardware and recorded software being directly embedded into computer hardware, for communication protocol implementation; recorded software being directly embedded into computer hardware, for facilitating application program interfacing for developing communication protocols, integrating communication and control equipment, observing, controlling and communicating with security, safety, monitoring and mapping equipment and devices; recorded software being directly embedded into computer hardware, for security and safety equipment management software, namely, software for controlling and operating cameras; electromagnetic radiation imagers; lasers not for medical use; infrared thermal detectors; radar apparatus; electro-optic and electroacoustic transducers; motion sensors; temperature sensors; electric acoustic sensors; chemical detectors being sensors for measuring the presence or quantity of chemicals, biological detectors being sensors for measuring the presence of or identifying biological contaminants, radiological and nuclear detectors in the nature of radioactivity measuring or identifying apparatus, and explosive detectors, namely, devices comprised of chemical and thermal sensors for the detection of explosives; recorded software being directly embedded into computer hardware, for smart city integration, namely, software for interfacing with police, first responders and other emergency personnel, software for controlling municipal building environmental systems, access systems, and security systems, and software for controlling traffic and mass transit systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Autonomous and remote-controlled unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); autonomous and remote-controlled unmanned land ground vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 31, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |