USPTO serial 88402963
ILLUMINATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, REBECCA ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ILLUMINATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. GREGORY GIBBS
A. GREGORY GIBBS WEIDE & MILLER LTD10655 PARK RUN DRIVE SUITE 100LAS VEGAS, NV 89144UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Flashlights; LED work lights for automotive repair settings; Shop lights, namely, indoor hanging flat panel lighting apparatus; Portable utility lights; LED (light emitting diode) lighting fixtures; LED flood lights and LED work lights for construction settings; LED lighting fixtures for indoor and outdoor lighting applications; Outdoor portable lighting products, namely, headlamps; Hands-free flashlights worn on the head; Portable battery-operated lights that can be placed on surfaces where other light sources are unavailable; Portable battery-operated high-intensity lights attached to flexible shafts | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 15, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |