USPTO serial 88404118
LIMELIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIMELIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicole K. McLaughlin
Nicole K. McLaughlin DUANE MORRIS LLP30 S. 17TH ST.PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-4196UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Lighting controls, namely, electric light dimmers; occupancy, motion, and photoelectric sensors, namely, electronic devices which detect the presence of occupants, measure daylight, and control lighting; load controllers for monitoring and controlling electronic devices and appliances; communication hubs; electronic hubs for connecting lighting systems to wired and wireless networks in buildings | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Electric lighting fixtures; lamps; electric luminaires; led lighting fixtures; led lamps; led luminaires | ACTIVE | Sep 5, 2018 |
| 042 | Technical support services, namely, remote administration, management and monitoring of lighting control systems and web and database applications and notification of related events and alerts; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for managing and monitoring lighting usage and energy consumption and generating information and reports; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software featuring technology enabling users to remotely view, monitor, manage, program, operate and control lighting systems and generate information and reports; consulting services in the fields of lighting and energy management to improve energy efficiency | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lutron Electronics Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lutron Electronics Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LIMELIGHT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2021 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2021 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 12, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2019 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |