USPTO serial 88406323
SHCC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HILL, JAMES T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHCC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan G. Morton
LONG HUA6-3A1005,YI CHENG ZHONG XINSHENZHEN, GUANGDONG, 518000Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Animal-activated pet feeders that include dispensers for releasing pet toy feeder balls with pet food and pet treats therein; Baking dishes; Barbecue mitts; Bath brushes; Bottle openers, electric and non-electric; Brushes for basting meat; Brushes for washing up; Brushes for pipes; Cages for pets; Cat litter pans; China ornaments; Cleaning brushes for household use; Clothes pins; Coffee scoops; Cold packs used to keep food and drink cold; Containers for household or kitchen use; Cookery molds; Cooking utensils, namely, grills; Corkscrews, electric and non-electric; Cosmetic brushes; Crockery, namely, pots, dishes, drinking cups and saucers, bowls, serving bowls and trays; Cutting boards for the kitchen; Dishes for soap; Disposable serving spoons; Drinking flasks; Drinking straws; Drinking vessels; Electric face cleansing brushes; Electric make-up removing appliances; Electric pet brushes; Electric toothbrushes; Electrically-heated hair brushes; Empty spray bottles; Eyebrow brushes; Eyelash brushes; Flower pot holders; Flower pots; Fly catchers; Fruit presses, non-electric, for household purposes; Garbage pails; Garlic presses; Grooming tools for pets, namely, combs and brushes; Hand-operated cooking sieves and sifters; Hand-operated coffee grinders; Heat-insulated containers for household use; Holders for flowers and plants; Ice cube moulds; Kitchen utensil, namely, non-metal flexible lid designed for draining or pressing liquids from a food can; Knife rests for the table; Make-up removing appliances; Nail brushes; Non-electric food blenders; Non-electric pressure cookers; Non-stick barbecue grill cooking mats for use on grills; Pet grooming device comprising a built in brush head and an attachment that connects to vacuums; Place mats of plastic; Plastic place mats; Portable cooking kits for outdoor use; Portable ice chests for food and beverages; Portable potties for children; Powder puffs; Rings for identifying birds; Rolling pins; Scoops for household purposes; Sponges for household purposes; Sprinkler heads for lawn sprinklers; Sprinklers for watering flowers and plants; Statues primarily of glass and also including precious metal; Statues of glass; Syringes for watering flowers and plants; Tea services in the nature of tableware; Tea kettles, non-electric; Tea strainers; Thermally insulated containers for food; Toilet brushes; Vacuum bottles; Washing brushes; Water bottles sold empty; Wine glasses; Works of art made of porcelain; Combs; Toothpicks; Whisks; Woks | ACTIVE | Jul 2, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2021 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2020 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2020 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 21, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2019 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | PBMR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Jul 6, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |