Drawing for KODIAK CAKES

USPTO serial 88406991

KODIAK CAKES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KODIAK CAKES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. Matthew Horlacher

H. Matthew Horlacher Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 11583Salt Lake City, UT 84110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Satchels, backpacks, all-purpose carrying bags, handbags, credit card cases, leather goods, namely, purses, rucksacks, briefcases, wallets, document cases, and luggage; pet accessories, namely, leashes, collars, and pet clothingACTIVE
027Sports equipment and accessories, namely, yoga matsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 26, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Dec 6, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 6, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 6, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
May 24, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 29, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 29, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 9, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Feb 24, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 24, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 24, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 24, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 24, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 13, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Aug 13, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 13, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 22, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Oct 14, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Oct 14, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 14, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 29, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 29, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Sep 12, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 11, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 11, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 12, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jan 1, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 31, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 31, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 15, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 2, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance