USPTO serial 88410668
CAROLINA LEMKE BERLIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BICE, DANIEL TRAVIS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAROLINA LEMKE BERLIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Agmon
JONATHAN AGMON SOROKER AGMON NORDMAN8 HAHOSHLIM ST.HERZLIYA, 4672408Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Spectacles; cases for spectacles and sunglasses; frames for spectacles and sunglasses; spectacle lenses; sunglasses; lenses for sunglasses; sunglass chains and cords; eyeglasses; eyeglass cases; eyeglass frames; antireflection coated eyeglasses; eyeglass retaining cords; reading eyeglasses; sports training eyeglasses; contact lenses; carrying cases and containers for contact lenses; filters for optical devices; laser equipment designed for cutting drilling, marking, engraving and shaping optical lenses for eyeglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Concession stands featuring eyewear, eyeglasses, spectacles, sunglasses and accessories therefor ; business administration and management; retail store services featuring eyewear, eyeglasses, spectacles, sunglasses and accessories therefor; supply chain management services; business operation, business administration and office functions; business organization and operation consultancy; franchising, namely, offering business management assistance in the establishment and/or operation of stores or concession stands for the sale of eyewear, eyeglasses, spectacles, sunglasses and accessories therefor; wholesale and retail store services featuring eyewear, eyeglasses, spectacles, sunglasses and accessories therefor; supply chain management services in the field of concession stands and retail shops, including online retail stores, featuring sunglasses, eyeglasses, optics, contact lenses and accessories therefor including carrying cases; administration of a customer loyalty program which provides incentives in the nature of product discounts and gifts for customers; advertising and marketing; advertising and marketing services provided by means of indirect methods of marketing communications, namely, social media, search engine marketing, inquiry marketing, internet marketing, mobile marketing, blogging and other forms of passive, sharable or viral communications channels; providing advertising, marketing and promotional services, namely, development of advertising campaigns provided through cable television broadcast, web casts, radio broadcasts, newspapers, magazines, online banners, outdoor billboards, wild postings, bus and subway ads | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |